🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring intently to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on the legislature to enact a bill lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement supporting a ban for under-16s unless guardian approval is granted. While it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good starting point," stated one parliamentarian driving the measure.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the administration has kept open a future ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Earlier, interest built behind a proposal to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. One foundation established by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering harmful online content suggests that a strict age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the Silicon Valley to design tools that are safe and fit for children," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local level due to national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra time needing a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted laws demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from various figures to copy the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Outside of the West, further nations are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion unfolds, the actions of Australia and several other countries show that policymakers internationally are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to make changes on their own.